Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
Recently, the phenomenon of making decisions in companies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of integrating the employees in making decisions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that cooperation with staff can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a professional standpoint, constructive ideas can provide companies with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a higher amount of good production and better services are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that the companies integrate their staff in making decisions are more successful in many factors of production. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both companies and employees apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of coordination, integrating staff policy might increase the consequences of discipline. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cooperation relate to this reality that the demerits of being self-centred pertain to the weaknesses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of wrong decisions is correlated negatively with impractical ideas. Hence, It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of making right decisions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of coordination in making decisions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of making effective decisions prove the significance of integrating workforce in making decision process, but also pinpoint the advancement in producing process and services.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79783393502 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32331597875 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.403018891 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307956797421 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908134344213 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775872948947 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169129978538 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623724839694 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.