In contemporary era, most marketing company focus on enticing customers by using jargon words which is difficult for common people to understand to get plethora of sell. I beileve it is negative developement on society and there are myriad of reasons for this phenomenon. This essay will pinpoint as well as elucidate promising reasons in ensuing paragraphs.
Expouding on the first and foremost, motive behind this belief is growing advancment in competetion among various manufacturer. For example, Samsung provides flagship phones since early days of android operating system. Recently, other phone companies such as MI, Xiomi and Vivo started stating that their phones are better as they have 108 megapixel camera. Little less the humans know, when taking pictures, there are various other components of camera that plays vital role. Moreover, each manufacturer want to lead in market share which in return turns into increase in number sell as people will always buy what others are using, thinking it is the best product available in the market. This increase in customer increase the sells number that leads to profit for the company.
Pondering on the second school of thoguht, at the outset of millennium, being deceiptive affect humankind in long run. Although people are getting bit better product due to healthy competetion, marketers are decieving mankind. Moreover, all this added extra features on products add cost as well as marketing cost raise prices of goods by leaps and bounds. Other than that, people are getting smarter day by day, once they understand company’s business model, they will not be loyal to that brand and move to some other company who is open and loyal to their customers. Additionally, this can negatively affect people’s mentality that they will take precuation before believing in something.
To summerize and recapitulate from aforementioned deliberation, it is quite conspicuous that advertising products are betters is not always true and it can have major malefic effect on company in longer run as humans can move to different provider who is honest and economical.
- A museum near your home is looking for people to do part time voluntary work You would like to do voluntary work at the museum Write a letter to the museum director to apply for work In your letter 1 Explain what you want to do voluntary work at the museu 89
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter 1 Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job 2 Say what else you c 73
- You recently organised an all day meeting for your company which took place in a local hotel In their feedback participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch Write a letter to the 89
- In some area of the US a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult What is your opinion on this 84
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand getting'.
Suggestion: understand getting
...which is difficult for common people to understand to get plethora of sell. I beileve it is negat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3115727003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7417723218 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626112759644 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2253072639 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136077122722 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410301995819 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336062786672 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737297443239 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02233754715 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.