There are some violent cartoon characters on TV such as mickey mouse which bring a negative influence on children. Do you agree or disagree? What types of TV Programs are suitable for children?
In the salad days of millennium, after the invention of cell phone and tv, a mania for cartoons, like Mickey mouse, avenger, and Spiderman has been increasing among the adolescent children, and it is very known figuratively, that, this kind of aggressive, negative and futile programs left a negative impact on an innocent kid.
To commence with, The UN, united nations, has made methodical research on toddlers, preschoolers and teenagers, to identify the psychological effect of cartoons and, shockingly they find out it made perilous effect, like desensitization. Interestingly, they find out children who watch violent shows more than 2 hours become tolerant to the terrifying event like murder, as he watches it every day visually on tv programs, due to left cortex immunization to the particular feeling, compassion for other human beings.
In addition, Researches also believe and prove that violent tv/mobile programs make children: aggressive because they are trying to mimic the character they admire, love and watch regularly; Addicted because of the immunity towards the Endorphin, which is responsible for addiction, as it released frequently by continuously watching tv series; lazy, as they do not have to do anything to get Dopamine which chemical is responsible for the influence to any activity.
Anyhow, the remedy is simple for this ailment, a neutral, compassionate, and knowledgeable tv program, as it is obvious that, make children away from the tv is not the solution. So, we have to choose alternate shows, like: discovery channel, which will increase the knowledge about science; National geography, which have an excellent program related to earth geography; Panchatantra and other knowledgeable stories, what increase wisdom.
To concise, I believe that parents and government both have to take charge of this situation. To sabotage it, parents have to minutely observe and guide children what to watch and what not to and the government has to ban the programs that are not advised for children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: VERY_KNOWN[1]
Message: Incorrect phrase. Use 'very well-known' or 'well-known' instead.
Suggestion: very well-known; well-known
...among the adolescent children and it is very known figuratively that this kind of aggressi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...compassion for other human beings In addition Researches also believe and prove that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to alternate'
Suggestion: to alternate
...s not the solution So we have to choose alternate shows like discovery channel which will...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as to, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21943573668 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88703671346 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 319.0 20.2975951904 1572% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1665.0 106.682146367 1561% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 319.0 20.7667163134 1536% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 41.0 7.06120827912 581% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313895880159 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.313895880159 0.084324248473 372% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165142099136 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390567139935 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 162.7 13.0946893788 1242% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -260.77 50.2224549098 -519% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.9 11.3001002004 1141% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.48 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.86 8.58950901804 278% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 129.6 10.1190380762 1281% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.