Today, more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
In recent times, there has been continuous concerns with regards to the increasing number of tourists, who have chosen to explore areas around the world with harsh conditions such as the Sahara desert and Antarctic Ocean. This adventurous practice has its pros and cons, which will be discussed in this essay with excerpts from the Nat Geo wild Journal and New York Independent magazine.
To begin with, man only occupies and extensively knows so much about 60% of the earth, with the remaining 40% (Sahara desert and Antarctic ocean inclusive) left to explore. Through tourism, man can decipher the hidden truth about such places, thereby increasing our knowledge base. In addition, schools curricula are modified to meet recent development and supported by pictures taken by tourists when they visit such places with harsh conditions. For example, students learn about mountains and deep ocean creatures in Geography, because tourists have provided current information because they were able to visit such places.
On a flip side, such adventures undoubtedly have serious disadvantages to the tourists. Firstly, tourists are exposed to attack by wild animals such as sharks and whales, found in the Antarctica. In most cases, such trips end up to being a survival mission other than tourism and possibly death. The Nat Geo Wild Journal reported that 70% of deaths in the Antarctic in 2018 were attributed to sharks. More so, the health condition of tourists often do not remain the same whenever they return from such trips. Extreme conditions such as high temperature, exposure to insect bite, and dusts are not human friendly and can affect vital organs (such as the skin, liver, lungs, and so on). According to the New York Independent magazine, John Armstrong, the first man to visit the Sahara died of kidney failure four years after he returned from the desert.
As a closing remark, the increase in knowledge base and modification of school curriculum to meet recent development, are part of the benefits of such adventures. However, the danger to human life and devastating health effects of tourists are setbacks which cannot be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | Niharika rani | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | abhilashranjan | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | bilalahmedch89@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | zukky | 89 | view |
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Is it good for children to start using computers from an early stage and spend long hours on them Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time say what action 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, for example, in addition, such as, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18624641834 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61883593529 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607449856734 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1191115671 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318120209906 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093028351707 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562906127535 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164332492719 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726139307847 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.