Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
Ever since the initiation of urbanization, the living standards in metropolitan cities are deteriorating. There are numerous reasons behind this disturbing trend. However, in my opinion, the main culprit is face-paced modernization. In order to address this issue, both efficient government policies and awareness among the people are important to tackle this seemingly insurmountable problem.
The population explosion in urban cities, firstly, is the most obvious driving factor behind the decreasing living standards. With an unprecedented surge in both the birth rate and migration from rural areas has led to increased population in the big cities. As a result, inflation in retail and housing industries has reached record levels. Pollution and traffic congestion, secondly, are a big headache to both the citizens and the government which ultimately leads to decreasing living standards. As per a recent report from the WHO (World Health Organization), even though the pace of modernization and development in the world is an all-time high, the living standards and citizen’s satisfaction, especially in urban society is at record lows.
In order to address this challenging problem, both the government and the people need to work hand-in-hand. To begin with, the government must fund more public awareness programs both at local and national levels to encourage people to be more environmentally friendly. For instance, they must be insisted to use the public transport system rather than using private cars. This simple change can lead to reducing traffic congestion and air pollution, ultimately resulting in a better environment. Public, on the other hand, should understand the gravity of the situation and be much more responsible by changing the attitude towards living. For instance, instead of pursuing to live in bigger and luxurious houses, they must look to live in smaller and more functional homes. Consequently, the rise in real-estate prices can be controlled and all the people can afford to have a roof over their heads at an affordable price.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that an upsurge in population and indifferent attitudes of the people have resulted in squalid urban lifestyle. Therefore, it is high time for both the people and the government to take corrective and timely actions to improve the living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-05 | maanpandya | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | heyimmehak@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | aman kola | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-15 | DoDt | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | thaskeen123 | 78 | view |
- Women can do everything that men can and they even do it better They also can do many things that men cannot But it is a fact that their work is not appreciated as much as men s although they have to sacrifice a lot for their family and career It is said 92
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children s study On the contrary those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental and physical development What is your opinion 92
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views a 73
- In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 84
- Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44986449864 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08479421945 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571815718157 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1494987742 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.722222222 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00720422881821 0.244688304435 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00330635532002 0.084324248473 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0136324522203 0.0667982634062 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00643273201472 0.151304729494 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011141818681 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.