Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is an increasingly popular idea that traffic congestion and accommodation issues which are the major problem in metropolises can be addressed by relocating factories and their respective employees to rural areas. From my sentiment, I strongly agree with this opinion. In this essay, I will support my view with valid argument and examples.
First and foremost, the traffic congestion could be addressed by transforming the companies and their infrastructures into the countryside. To prove my point, the congestion in cities which always happens in peak hours comes from the general public traveling around the city and the employees commuting from companies going to and from home. Therefore, If the offices or the factories move to the rural ones, the number of worker’s vehicles will be reduced dramatically on the city streets. As a result, the traffic jam obviously reduces in rush hours. Hanoi applied this solution that results in the dramatic reduction of traffic congestion would be an example worth mentioning.
Admittedly, it could also be said that the housing problems could be tackled by implementing that solution. There is a fact that employees working in buildings tend to find apartments near their office. Hence, the demand for housing close factories and company's branches will certainly increase. If factories and companies move to rural locations, this workforce will follow this trend. Consequently, city apartment blocks will undoubtedly increase in availability.
In conclusion, relocating workers and factories to rural areas which are possible solutions address heavy traffic conditions and lack of adequate accommodation in big cities. It not only tackles those major problems, but it also brings a better environment and living conditions to the metropolitans.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-02 | ratnumohit | 78 | view |
2018-12-04 | nmily89 | 78 | view |
2018-12-04 | nmily89 | 73 | view |
2018-10-16 | thanhvan9893 | 78 | view |
2018-10-16 | thanhvan9893 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- In some countries the widespread use of internet has given people more freedom to work or study at home instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 92
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- One of the most pressing problems facing the world today is overpopulation What policies do you believe governments should adopt to address the causes and effects of this problem 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
... in cities which always happens in peak hours comes from the general public traveling...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ys happens in peak hours comes from the general public traveling around the city and the emplo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5652173913 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05442303963 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3761189937 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352524419742 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108156532135 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604978325004 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196946168129 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819061239114 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.