It is undeniable that lawbreakers have certain characteristics which motivate him to do further crime. An advocate can acknowledge about the criminal activities analysing his criminal history. But Australian and British law don't give the permission to access the criminal history during the final decision. Some lawyers didn't support this law and argued to change this rules. I also strongly agree with them and detail arguments given below.
At first, sometimes criminal have their past criminal activities which leads him to do further crime. His previous activity may be inter-linked with current activity. For example, if one is previously hanked up for theft, it will help someone to take decision about him for hijacking or kidnapping. It also scrutinizes a jury to take proper decision him. Because, justice should equal for everyone and all have right to get justice.
In addition, In justice sometime patronized criminal to do further crime. If judge don't give a criminal appropriate punishment, he will get a chance to do it again. For instance, if someone accused for corruption and bailed with minimum penalty, It will encourage to do it again. Because, this time he knew about the loopholes of law. Therefore, a jury should take a step on the basis of all criminal history. Criminal will afraid of wrongdoings.
In conclusion, I pen down and state that life of many people depends on a decision of a jury. He should take the right decision at any how. There is an anecdotal it is not a fact how many right decision you made, But never make a wrong decision. Jury should have permission to access all criminal history of a criminal
- Some people argue that if children behave badly , their parents should accept responsibility and also be punished for the behaviour of their children . Do you agree or disagree ?? 61
- Some people think that teenagers who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adult criminals To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...history. But Australian and British law dont give the permission to access the crimi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...during the final decision. Some lawyers didnt support this law and argued to change t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... criminal to do further crime. If judge dont give a criminal appropriate punishment,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...with minimum penalty, It will encourage to do it again. Because, this time he knew ab...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...alty, It will encourage to do it again. Because, this time he knew about the loopholes ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98913043478 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76768672217 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539855072464 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4631866281 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.85 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283388130805 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874173874958 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774598136592 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17447684005 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698571412519 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.