The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There are different opinions in regard to the question of whether cell phones should be restricted in certain areas and places or not. The debates over this topic seem to consist of two irreconcilable camps. I absolutely agree the idea of banning mobile phones in special places, such as schools, museums and theatres. In this essay the detailed analysis will be provided and final conclusion will be given.
Firstly, cell phones are not exclusive anymore, because it is a commodity product and even children at schools use mobiles during breaks. However, the negative effect of this is that pupils stop to communicate each other or make any activity. Consequently, it brings many problems, for example, rising stress, obesity, loosing interest for learning process. Therefore, cell phones should be banned in schools and very limited at home. As result, it will rise up children’s activity, reduce stress and improve health overall.
Secondly, ringing mobiles disturb a great number of people in such places as museums, theatres and cinemas, because everybody understands that atmosphere in these places is essential. If any additional noise happen, it will ruin great emotions during a performance. Therefore, all these public places have special sign about restrictions of using cell phones. Moreover, some areas have an equipment which blocks mobile phone’s signal and prevents any destructive noise from them.
In conclusion, I support the idea of banning mobile phones in certain areas or places, because it will improve children’s health if we talk about schools. Another area is public places where an atmosphere is a key factor, therefore cell phones should be restricted there as well.
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes shouldbe punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ere are different opinions in regard to the question of whether cell phones should be restricted in cer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... obesity, loosing interest for learning process. Therefore, cell phones should be banne...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3717472119 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79614206895 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3597687006 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266165874987 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872200921332 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841268955359 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172449095816 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583992370301 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.