The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that using cell phones lead to antisocial behaviors similar to smoking. Therefore, it should be forbidden in certain areas like smoking. Although I believe cell phones have the potential to result in more closed up individuals, their benefits outweigh their disadvantageous and thus prohibiting them cannot be a logical solution.
On the one hand, spending plenty amount of time on mobile phones has turned people to be more introvert. Young adults are so attached to their mobile phones that cannot be seen without them. People spend most their time socializing on the virtual web instead of paying attention to their real surrounding. They miss spectacular opportunities to make new friends or even find their other half while looking down at their phone screens.
On the other hand, mobile phones have changed human’s life tremendously for the better. Friends and family members are just a phone call away. People can browse the internet for any question that pops up in their mind at any given moment. Besides, cell phones like any other invention can be used in both ways, i.e., to human advantageous or disadvantageous. They do not necessarily cause antisocial behaviors since they can be used to bring people closer and help them to keep in touch while being miles away. Moreover, mobile phones give humans the chance to share their special moments with their loved ones in an instance. For example, when celebrating a birthday, grandparents who live in another country can join the party through video conferencing applications such as Skype. Hence, this new technology has made communication easier, faster and more reliable.
In conclusion, cell phones can make people to be more drawn to themselves and avoid social interactions while drowning themselves in their smart phones. Nevertheless, mobile phones can be used in beneficial manners to help individuals to get closer to each other instead of growing apart, and like any other technology it depends on how they are used. As a result, a better approach would be teaching people the culture of using such devices instead of banning them altogether.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | b.yousefi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- tourists and not local people are visiting museums and historical sites. why is it so and what are the ways to attract local people? 84
- In many countries, there is shortage of mathematics and science teachers in high school.What do you think has caused this problem and what can be done about it? 84
- Write a letter to your friend from whom you borrowed something that accidentally broke Please say Remind him her what have you borrowed Explain what happened What you will do about it 44
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offenses.What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The local council has decided to build a block of flats on the park opposite the place where you are living Write a letter to the editor of the local newspaper Where did you hear this news and your opinion The reason why you protest it Make suggestions fo 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le looking down at their phone screens. On the other hand, mobile phones have ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 874, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation easier, faster and more reliable. In conclusion, cell phones can make peop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20172910663 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77712324608 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579250720461 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9475747672 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.277777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269115606583 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947554543574 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712022458001 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17698287292 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354299761525 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.