The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mobile phones are considered antisocial and similar like smoking, therefore a significant number of individuals believe that mobile phones must be forbidden as smoking is in some locations. While addiction of these technical tools can make people isolated from the society, I believe without these gadgets can have more serious problems in connectivity.
Mobile phones act as a career for social connectivity with the help of internet. Although people are not physically connected, they can share their personal emotions and feeling about any concern they have on social platforms like Facebook applications. For instance, recently a cricket world cup match held in London between India and New Zealand was criticized by fans and critics on different platforms with the help of mobile phones because of low quality umpiring. Hence banning these items can create more problems in the society.
However, the excess use or misuse of these gadget can make people isolated from society and the addiction of such items can also show adverse impacts on individuals. For instance, addiction of social networking websites like Facebook and WhatsApp utilized most of the free time of individuals these days. Some precautionary measures like discipline in usage can eliminate such problems.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that excess use of mobile can make people away from the society, prohibiting mobile phone usage is no way an effective way to control the antisocial behaviour of individuals but this step will increase the difficulty in connecting with other individuals. Hence, banning of mobile phones is no way similar to smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | b.yousefi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 61
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The best way to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving education course before being licensed to drive. To what extent do you agree? 56
- You are studying for a qualification, and you would like some time off work to complete it.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter Ask for some time off to complete a qualification.Suggest what you will do later at work if you have to time o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...phones because of low quality umpiring. Hence banning these items can create more pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this gadget' or 'these gadgets'?
Suggestion: this gadget; these gadgets
... However, the excess use or misuse of these gadget can make people isolated from society a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41245136187 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80568221925 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575875486381 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6153489804 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240368533231 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108117927946 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120501449465 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156410845401 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827911699951 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.