The use of violence in music lyrics video games and films seen by children is causing concern in many societies What problems may be caused by this type of violent imagery and what steps could be taken to lessen the impact on young people

Excessive use of violence in media and other children’s platform can ultimately take a serious toll on children and their families in various ways. We will discuss the most serious problems arising, and also two ways in which the situation can be improved.

Firstly, the gravest problem is that children get inspired by the violence shown on the social media and might indulge in violent behavior. It means that, as children are immature, get fascinated by the fights and armory shown in the films and thus tend to imitate those acts. This incites teenagers to commit criminal offence. Secondly, Children who are exposed to violence on TV or in video games tend to play much more aggressively. This can have detrimental effect on their health. The long term consequent problems of this inclination may include depression and academic underperformance.

To counteract these dangers, perhaps the most effective and most immediate solution would be parents to monitor the programs being watched by the children’s and guide them. It means that parents have to deter children from watching violence and encourage them to do sports or watch educative programs instead. If parents allocated more time to children, it would aid in their all-round development. A second remedy might be to have strict regulations on the programs being telecasted on social media. If such rules were implemented by the government, it would greatly reduce the violence shown on the media.

In conclusion, children aggressive behavior and tendency to involve in crime seems to be the major problems. Coordinated effort from parents and government appear to be the best solution to tackle these issues.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25185185185 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8134597128 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4690621977 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198577227494 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646854826286 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280031338184 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115423025661 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244814410997 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.