Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree

The dependence on water in our daily lives is a necessity, and the world would not be able to exist without it. As a natural resource, water should be free at all times. In this essay I will discuss how the cash that can be used for other things is used to buy water which should be free, and the disadvantage of not having access to bottled water as it is being sold.

On the one hand, the Government banning selling of bottled water is advantageous because the money that could have been used to buy bottled water is used to get other necessary stuffs. To illustrate, whenever a housewife goes to the market to buy foodstuffs, the concentration should be on the main aim and not to spend money on what can be gotten for free. Going to the grocery store, for instance, cash that would be spent to buy water can be used to purchase items such as detergents for washing at home. The authorities should do the needful! To be clear, being able to purchase other important items with money is a key advantage of banning the selling of bottled water.

On the other hand, when the Government bans bottled water, it becomes a disadvantage because purified water is no longer accessible for free. For example, people are exposed to different bacteria once they drink untreated water and eventually fall sick with time. Health is wealth, right? Similarly, individuals would not be able to avoid the time taken to boil water for drinking, and the cooking gas wasted in the process until they resort to buying bottled water. Clearly, the lack of access to purified or treated water is disadvantageous to the banning of selling bottled water.

To conclude, I have discussed how the cash that can be used for other things is used to buy water which should be free, and the disadvantage of not having access to bottled water as it is being sold.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60182370821 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52229826262 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44376899696 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2210663022 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3846678042 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175955378287 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909267200492 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281978323857 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336409100155 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60182370821 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52229826262 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44376899696 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2210663022 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3846678042 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175955378287 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909267200492 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281978323857 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336409100155 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.