Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Money plays a vital role in our day to day life. However, being rich does not assure anyone a blissful life. I strongly believe love, compassion and moral support are major factors which are required to keep our lives happy and peaceful.
Being financially strong is always important. Nevertheless, money should not develop an egoistic nature. One should always be down to earth and be warm to others. Money will definitely pay bills and buy luxuries of the world but handling it in a right way is more important. There is no surety that rich people will never fall sick or they will never face any crisis. Ups and downs are part and parcel of life. Hence, it is important to be kind and affectionate to all without any bias. As this will create an internal happiness which will stay along for a lifetime.
There are people who feel having money will make them invincible ad they run behind money to compete with the society. Everyone pretends to be happy but internally they do face problems. If, money would had assured happiness then no billionaire would be worried. It is always observed wealthy people are more prone to depression and anxiety this is due to stress and urge to earn more money. For instance, people who live an ordinary life with basic amenities lead a peaceful life with their family but business tycoons and wealthy people are always victims of money laundering cases or bribe cases due to their greedy nature.
In conclusion, I opine that being rich by heart and having a helpful nature will assure more happiness rather than having money which is temporary. One must learn to lead a simple life without any greed and should feel content.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- A Work colleague has applied for new job, and he/she has asked you to write a reference letter to the new employer.Write a letter to the employer to recommend your colleague.In your letter,a. State your reason for writing and say how you know the applican 87
- Work is being done on the street where you live. The noise is disturbing you.Write a letter of complaint to your local council. In your letter,A)Introduce yourself,B)Explain what the problem is,C)Suggest solutions to the problem 87
- in some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness.To what extent do you agree with this statement?Provide reasons for your answer. Include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y luxuries of the world but handling it in a right way is more important. There is no surety t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y but internally they do face problems. If, money would had assured happiness then...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'earning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: earning
... anxiety this is due to stress and urge to earn more money. For instance, people who li...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75257731959 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35404469679 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2259613872 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8333333333 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0369006409986 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0117315519514 0.084324248473 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0177998704183 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0205690027371 0.151304729494 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178626712734 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.