Women empowerment in military and police
Undoubtedly, there is hardly any area where women's have not proved their mettle. They are in space research, military services, and air force services. In spite of above facts, some percentage of the gender-biased population still prejudice against the participation of female in security services, because of comparatively less physical strength and more emotional behavior than male. In my perspective, Women's are prosperous and diligent militants and their strong determination and endeavor help them to achieve the set targets.
On one hand, Physical strength is considered as a fundamental metric, to become a militant. Being little weak in strength women are often deterred by some of the people to become a militant because for catching a terrorist or the criminal, who jumps from one roof to other requires a lot of power and courage, that sometimes females are not able to attain, and lose the culprit. This example proves their point of view. Moreover, the other reason for discouraging the female is their emotional behavior, as Its known to all that women's are more emotional than the men, so surviving in the areas where accidents, killing, murder, and rape are very common can provide them stress and make them emotionally weak, which sometimes leads into unfair decision. For illustration, in case of rape, culprit emotional lies to save himself in front of women officer can confuse her and effect in taking a decision.
On the other hand, women's have a greatly influential and leadership quality, so in cases, where government needs to console the public, women officer can do it more effectively because of their caring nature, so in this case their emotional nature act as weapon and this weapon, can also help the victim to testify against the culprit so that culprit can be easily punished. In addition to that, there is the certain religion, according to which male cannot touch the female criminal while arresting or investigation, in such cases women officers is intrinsic. For instance in India, a male police always needed to assist with the female collogue to arrest the female criminal otherwise, he cannot arrest the criminal. Furthermore, now it is compulsory in some country to take the same military training by both genders, and women's are finishing that easily, so physical strength should not be considered as an impacting factor anymore. Such as In Israel for 2 years military training is compulsory to all civilians, and almost 50% of their military force have females and considered as the strongest defense system.
In conclusion, security service chooses the militants on the basis of the capacity and their ability, not on some dogmatic facts. Females need to be given an equal opportunity to have a lucrative career, as equivalent decision making will unite the country and going to make a strong defense system.
- some people say that the more a product is advertised more people buy it To what extend do you agree 73
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 78
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned Do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 78
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...in strength women are often deterred by some of the people to become a militant because for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 467.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13276231263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74803674555 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526766595289 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6521511052 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8125 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1875 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15942979181 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516117747853 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408362470495 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876058319242 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641469294326 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.