World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership.
"Whether men or women are appropriate candidate for being a leader" is a never ending debate. Some people believe men are more capable to lead a team, while others, especially women, think that female are better option for this position. Despite the fact that amount of argument and violent behavior was low when a man was leader, I believe women are better at leading and guideing a group since they are less triodes and more flexible.
First of all, it should be stuck in mind that the most important properties for a leader is being goal-oriented and broadminded. As a matter of fact, both genders, men and women, are able to be this way, but according to psychological investigations, although men are more serious but they are single-tasking. In fact, most of the men, can focus on one task at moment. In contrast, women are considered as a multi-tasking who are able to do several things at the same time.
On the other hand, since women are more flexible, they can handle those arguments and conflicts between the members of the team more appropriately. It is obvious that male are less patient which result in showing more violent behaviors. In contrast, female have higher degree of patient and are able to tolerate any difficulties or disagreement for longer time.
Another reason that can be mentioned is that women are more prices and caution that result in considering all related aspects. For instance, they are more caution about deadlines and all restrictions.
All in all, it seems women are able to lead a team more appropriately in comparison with men, because they are more flexible, caution and multi-tasking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun triodes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing and guideing a group since they are less triodes and more flexible. First ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00722021661 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91438835829 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6193684736 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127881838624 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531968192739 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261972969264 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776263713175 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295370586891 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.