You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
No person in this world will achieve success if one will not work hard for his/her goal. However, I do believe that only hard work will not be sufficient to reach out objective; smart work is also required in today's competitive world. I will elaborate my ideas in my further paragraphs.
To embark on, no one can deny that all famous and successful persons work rigorously to achieve their goals; they have sacrifices several thing in their life. For instance, Rajni Kant - a renowned India movie star - was a bus conductor prior to reach his success. However, during his difficult time, he never stopped practicing his acting talent, and never gave up his dream. He would have lost in that tough situation, had he gave up his dream, and stopped believing his ability. Self-confidence and self-belief are two major qualities of successful persons.
Furthermore, are we all successful although we all work hard? The answer is definite "No", because not everyone can perceive opportunity. A stone can be break in one blow, if one hit the stone at the right spot and with right force. Similarly, if a person can detect opportunity at right time with all relevant efforts and resources, success is guaranteed. For instance, Steve Job - a great visionary - was successful because of his capability to identify the opportunity. There were hundreds of companies dealing with electronic products, but Steve could identify the need of the market at correct time, and came up with a product - "Iphone", which fascinate consumers, and later success story is known to all.
To recapitulate, although hard work is necessary to be a successful person, the other qualities such as self-confidence, self-belief and ability to grab opportunity are also important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- Write about the following topic:Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.Give reasons for your an 84
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment).Do you agree or disagree? 73
- You have been working in an international company in abroad. Now you are going back to home country without informing your office friends. Write an apology letter to these friends.In the letter, you should:•apologies to your friends•explain why you ar 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'several things'.
Suggestion: several things
...hieve their goals; they have sacrifices several thing in their life. For instance, Rajni Kant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17073170732 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07414474648 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9445945262 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141960005351 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489613244918 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333973193704 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810813820984 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341259051915 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.