1
To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people say that major cities must be studied in order to understand the most important characteristics of a society. They cite this reason based on the belief that the important characteristics are carried only by the intellectual people of the society who live in the major cities. However, I strongly disagree with this belief and suggest that the characteristics of a society are not possessed only by its major cities but the minor ones as well. I will support my viewpoint with two reasons.
First of all, the traditions and culture of a society is not necessary to be originated from the major cities. For example, there are many traditions, such as welcoming the guests with a ceremony, which are practiced mostly in the rural areas. These types of characteristics are not seen in the major cities, so, to understand them one must study the rural areas as well. It is important to understand that rural places also have provided significant contribution towards a society because every society in its early phase begins from the rural area only and after their development, they grow into major cities.
Secondly, it is not necessary that the characteristics of a society should be associated with major cities at all. For example, some of the major cities might be planned and developed by the government in the recent time such that it does not possess any history with it at all. Studying this type of cities to find the characteristics is of no point because of no history associated with them at all. Thus it is important to know how old a city is such that it contains any history with it or not.
In conclusion, the issue of whether major cities should be studied to find the history associated with a society is complex. Some have suggested that, major cities should be studied. Nevertheless, I still contend that it is not only major cities which should be studied but also the minor cities from which society characteristics might be associated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | cogax13515 | view | |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | ayaitch1elt | 95 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
- measure to stop an amphibian species to spread 73
- The following were written in response to the task "Working in Teams" on pages196to198.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- 1 3
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sl 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 129, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... with major cities at all. For example, some of the major cities might be planned and devel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...no history associated with them at all. Thus it is important to know how old a city ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87551605953 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.414215686275 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5090155939 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.