• 19. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In this day and age, because of advanced technology, there are a wide variety of resources which people can use to be aware of what is happening around the world. People can watch the news in TV when they are at homes, or use the internet and different news sites to read the last update of news. In this regard, some people believe that one should use different news resources to get different and more accurate information, while others think the opposite, saying that there is no need to allocate lots of time for many news resources. I subscribe to the former opinion, and in the ensuing paragraphs, I will provide two reasons to illustrate my point of view.
To begin with, some news resources do not present the whole information or even the accurate news. There is less resources which does not have a particular view which leads to highlight some part of information that is not very important. Besides, they maybe do not pay enough attention in some information which is important, because they do not want people to inform about that particular information. For example, two years ago in my country, for presidential election, each channel in TV has its own view, therefor, they had a tendency to show the news in way which presented their own view, and persuaded the people to vote the candidate they want. In some situations like this, if people had not used different resources to get news, they would not have well informed about the more accurate news. Hence, it is clear that people need to use many different resources to inform about more neutral news, and can get all aspects of a particular news.
The second reason is that, each news resource cover only some part of news. To be well- informed, people should raise their knowledge in different aspects of information, such as politics, economics, etc. But one channel cannot cover all these kind of information, thus, one can use different resources to obtain information about different kind of news. Also, people can get a general information about a topic, or get more detailed information about the same topic depends on the news resources. For example, there is one channel which only talk about some general news about political decision all around the world. If I have interest about one topic, and want to know more about that news, I will search that topic on the internet to get more detailed information about that topic. Therefore, people cannot be well-informed by using only one news resources, and should use different sites and channels to get information about all aspects of one topic.
In conclusion, considering both the reasons mentioned above, I believe that people should use different news resources to be well- informed. Owing to this fact that one news resources may not declare some information as it is because of its own view about some topic, or maybe does not present accurate news. Moreover, one news resources cannot cover all different kinds of news, or cover all aspects of one news, so it is better to use different resources.
- •Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in group led by a tour guide. 73
- 33. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- •18. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' job. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Physical exercise is more important for older people than young people. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easons to illustrate my point of view. To begin with, some news resources do no...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are less resources'?
Suggestion: There are less resources
... information or even the accurate news. There is less resources which does not have a particular view w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ce, it is clear that people need to use many different resources to inform about more neutral ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 939, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'particular news'.
Suggestion: particular news
...eutral news, and can get all aspects of a particular news. The second reason is that, each ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... get all aspects of a particular news. The second reason is that, each news res...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould raise their knowledge in different aspects of information, such as politics...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
..., etc. But one channel cannot cover all these kind of information, thus, one can use diffe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me general news about political decision all around the world. If I have interest...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mation about all aspects of one topic. In conclusion, considering both the reas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 521.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8330134357 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58508847519 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387715930902 0.524837075471 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 802.8 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7611596834 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.05 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228696809268 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101457654385 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602642782724 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169422791381 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174833002575 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.