In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today.
Many people are hopeful that there will be less air pollution in 20 years than there is today. I agree with that opinion for two reasons. After many decades of development, renewable energy has become affordable and, in my own lifetime, I have seen a reduction in air pollution.
First, alternative energy production has finally become affordable after many years of refining the technology. When solar panels were first developed, it was obvious that they were a better source of energy than fossil fuels. Sunlight is free and using it to create electricity generates far less pollution than burning fossil fuels. Unfortunately, solar panels were very expensive to produce, and they weren't very efficient. Today, solar panels are inexpensive, durable, and generate much more energy than ever before. As more people, companies, and cities switch over to solar energy and other renewable energy sources, the amount of air pollution from fossil fuels will decrease.
Second, I am confident that air pollution will be reduced because I have already seen it happen in my hometown. When I was young, the city had very bad air pollution. The city is in a valley, and during the winter there was often a brown cloud of pollution hanging over it. On days like that, the news would give air pollution warnings and call it a red day. The city government and companies worked together to reduce the amount of air pollution, and they have been very successful. Over the last few years, there have been very few red days even though the population of the city continues to grow.
In conclusion, I believe that there will be much less air pollution 20 years from now. I think this is likely because solar energy and other renewable resources have become inexpensive, and I have seen that air pollution can be reduced if people work together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | edsonsimoes | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | devvratjoshi | 70 | view |
- Among the intriguing mysteries that the dinosaurs have left for us one of the most persistent is what the arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex T rex were used for A recent presentation to the American Geological Society presented evidence to support the idea that th 63
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 53
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere 3
- Playing games together is a good way to build closer relationships 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ere very expensive to produce, and they werent very efficient. Today, solar panels are...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92580645161 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56719276021 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506451612903 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1209866827 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393380457621 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141502868012 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197595250294 0.0737576698707 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277953817726 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113787477928 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.