It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, the swift and monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought us exceptional convenience and enhanced our life quality. But, whether this is the maximum level of quality that human can attain. The following essay takes an elaborating look at the statement that we are witnessing the ultimate point of improvements.
There is no denying that up to now the human never have seen and experienced such tremendous progression in all field of science. In fact, the viewpoint of we have succeeded to reach the climax of most achievements is a bit irrational and mostly due to our excitements. Believe it or not, the future will be astonishingly different from now. For instance, air taxies are gradually becoming popular or high-speed trains are booming quickly. Furthermore, NASA is working on the project that allows us to be able to communicate between earth and Mars and our next destination for dwelling might be this planet.
In addition, as our ambition has no end we want to possess the sun; our programs for the future requires a big source of energy and the best one is solar energy. I as a mechanical engineer strictly testify that in the near future, maybe in 10 years, all our automobiles, ships, power plants, buildings, agricultural systems, and factories will drive by solar energy. In this regard a group of mechanical, electrical, chemical and materials engineering is gathered together, at ANU University, to work on a new generation of photovoltaic systems. They predicted that their modules will be capable to have the efficiency of 80%, whereas the available module's efficiency is about 24%.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that this is the beginning of our sequential advancements. By being aware of the huge and ambitious project that is planned for the future we easily could find that the surprises waiting for us.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- The extended family(grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement people who move out of their native village or towns are more successful and happier than people who stay in their native villages or towns. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than having profound knowledge about this job. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should buy things that are made in their own country, even if the price of these products is higher than that of the products made in other countries. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'modules'' or 'module's'?
Suggestion: modules'; module's
...fficiency of 80%, whereas the available modules efficiency is about 24%. To wrap ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...find that the surprises waiting for us.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11403508772 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06421169595 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4304326188 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10027216798 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332086040935 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0206884159474 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590537511535 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213338531884 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.