It goes without saying that, we as a Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and is becoming complex swiftly. By this definition, although monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought convenience with itself, that isn't the mere profit. Believe it or not, we are destroying our planet with maximum power. Indeed, our comfort has yielded against losing our environment. Just after a century after the industrial revolution, over-use and abuse from available natural resources have triggered the condition on the earth to reach an alarming level. Nowadays, the controversial topic is how to overcome this danger and preserve the earth for our off-springs. Someone is in view that it is an issue attributed to the governments and national organizations and the individuals have not any responsibility regarding it. While others contradict said viewpoint and strictly claim that it is a common concern and everyone should be as helpful as he/she can. The following essay takes an elaborating look at this issue to reach a rational conclusion though providing compelling reasons.
There is no denying that we all are in one shape, so the consequence of every single person will cover all others. Firstly, we should have a conservative attitude toward surrounding and all kind of ecosystems. In fact, here we refer to both ordinary people and the government. So, each of them by acting their tasks based on existing tools, options and facilities could be effective. Admittedly, although it is a complex process to handle, it is not impossible too. The individuals can be impressive by not throwing away garbage, using public transportation, consuming organic materials, using recyclable pots and avoid extravagance (immoderation).
On the other hand, the statement could take strategy to improve infrastructures and subsequently spreading Eco-friendly technologies. In this regard, the chief capabilities of government are as, the prevalence of renewable energies, electronic-based procedures, modified industrial and agricultural systems, public awareness, efficient transportation, and wildlife (fauna and flora) protection. The implementation of aforesaid cases is beyond normal peoples might. A group of sociologists, geologists, biologists, and meteorologists gathered together to analyze the influence rate of both government and individuals in improving the situation, through conducting several experiments. Finally, they announced that in there is a direct relation between budgeting on the eco-based policies and cooperation of people and reduction in the greenhouse emission.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that people are a part of the government and if they guide them appropriately, in a cooperative manner this issue could solve easily. Definitely, neither government nor people lonely can be successful to conserve the world.
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement people who move out of their native village or towns are more successful and happier than people who stay in their native villages or towns. 85
- Do you agree or disagree：the best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’salary. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- 48. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Younger school student children (age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math science, history, and language. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e brought convenience with itself, that isnt the mere profit. Believe it or not, we ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cooperative manner" with adverb for "cooperative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t and if they guide them appropriately, in a cooperative manner this issue could solve easily. Definite...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be successful to conserve the world.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, while, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2524.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68468468468 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35215044237 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8310795356 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.727272727 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150916925135 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357793240238 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444705852402 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775974656638 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385570548336 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 86.8835125448 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.