It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more complex. By this definition, monumental scientific and technological achievements have triggered tough competition among countries and even companies. Indeed, every section follows own profit to obtain maximum wealth and power. Actually, the higher producing and selling rate, the higher international reputation. Subsequently having an efficient effect on the controlling of world chief issues. The following essay takes an elaborating look at whether people should be obliged to buy merely their native-product goods and commodities.
There is no denying that to support internal producers and showing patriotism sense, it is better to interdict using external products voluntarily. In this case, they build a kind of public unity to have the share in the prosperity of their country. Certainly, in this situation, the foreign enemy couldn't have the dare of imposing economic sanctions against the internally allied nation. Furthermore, they take as an example of solidarity and act in the same way in the other spheres. Subsequently, the considered country would be able to overcome any difficulties they mat faced in the future.
Conversely, some people repudiate this attitude by presenting some reasonable reasons. Based on their view, although forbidding importing external goods seems rational, by meticulous analyzing we can found that it leads to a destructive outcome. The implementing of this idea eradicates the competition among the inner corporations because they are assured that they have a perpetual market and investing in the new high-tech machines is wasting money. For instance, Iran Khodroo is a car company located in Iran is benefiting from the provided monopoly. While the main losers are the people how do not have any choices to choose from and are forced to buy the available low-quality vehicle.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that is not lonely an advantage. In some cases, the advantages of joining the global market outweigh restricting it. Accordingly, the country that is active in the world trade benefits from advanced technologies, huge and intriguing clients and consumers, facilitating the transmission of knowledge and investment, reduces costs and diminishing the unemployment rate. Generally, we can say that there is no reputation in depriving of these benefits.
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement The best way to learn about a foreign country is to read newspapers and magazines from that country 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should focus their budget more on environmental protection than on economic development. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement people who move out of their native village or towns are more successful and happier than people who stay in their native villages or towns. 85
- The personal and work-related challenges that young people face today are not very different from the challenges their parents and grandparents faced in the past 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...e, the higher international reputation. Subsequently having an efficient effect on the contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y, in this situation, the foreign enemy couldnt have the dare of imposing economic sanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficulties they mat faced in the future. Conversely, some people repudiate this a...
^^^
Line 4, column 693, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... buy the available low-quality vehicle. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utation in depriving of these benefits.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, conversely, furthermore, if, look, so, while, for instance, kind of, in some cases, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10182074833 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641558441558 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6198349378 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.15 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120876416488 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315772951518 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423630155275 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064998035356 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457655652144 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.01818996416 131% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.