Accessing the internet and using such facilities make our life easier in today's world. We can access a lot of information just by simply clicking.
A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether governments offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost or otherwise make it more costly. Some people possess the conviction that the former could be more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful.
I personally, content that this issue is multifaceted. I think we all have this right to access the internet and use online services in its base. The last research had shown that the usage of online services is increased during the last decades. while we can connect with other people and some process is faster rather than past, the government should increase the internet access facilities and free for every people. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is there are three-quarters of social services based on the internet. some services deal with important parts of our life like the health care system, banking industry, transportation, etc.
Despite the fact that all people have a modern cellphone, it necessitates assistance to enhance this idea. Consider my personal experience to make the point more clear. A year ago, I joint to conferences which had held to explain digital services and their usage in our country. The main goal of that event circulated on this issue that there was hugely dissatisfaction in our development based on the fact that there was a lack of budget.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that when we use free internet its results on our economy are desirable and obvious. For instance, when a consumer can access our website and products they feel agreeable and auspicious about their purchase so they are willing to attain it again and as the result, its impact feels on our economic features.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that the government should offer Internet access to all of its citizens at no cost.
Accessing the internet and using such facilities make our life easier in today's world. We can access a lot of information just by simply clicking.
A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether governments offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost or otherwise make it more costly. Some people possess the conviction that the former could be more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful.
I personally, content that this issue is multifaceted. I think we all have this right to access the internet and use online services in its base. The last research had shown that the usage of online services is increased during the last decades. while we can connect with other people and some process is faster rather than past, the government should increase the internet access facilities and free for every people. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is there are three-quarters of social services based on the internet. some services deal with important parts of our life like the health care system, banking industry, transportation, etc.
Despite the fact that all people have a modern cellphone, it necessitates assistance to enhance this idea. Consider my personal experience to make the point more clear. A year ago, I joint to conferences which had held to explain digital services and their usage in our country. The main goal of that event circulated on this issue that there was hugely dissatisfaction in our development based on the fact that there was a lack of budget.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that when we use free internet its results on our economy are desirable and obvious. For instance, when a consumer can access our website and products they feel agreeable and auspicious about their purchase so they are willing to attain it again and as the result, its impact feels on our economic features.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that the government should offer Internet access to all of its citizens at no cost.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends 50
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s is increased during the last decades. while we can connect with other people and so...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... social services based on the internet. some services deal with important parts of o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., banking industry, transportation, etc. Despite the fact that all people have a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05066666667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7813346117 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3771914752 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424314013722 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129338121591 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147179070924 0.0737576698707 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21653656814 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188056250187 0.0645574589148 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s is increased during the last decades. while we can connect with other people and so...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... social services based on the internet. some services deal with important parts of o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., banking industry, transportation, etc. Despite the fact that all people have a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05066666667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7813346117 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3771914752 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.222222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424314013722 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129338121591 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147179070924 0.0737576698707 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21653656814 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188056250187 0.0645574589148 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.