A/D: The best way to increase the education quality in the country is to increase teachers’ salary.
Throughout the history, high-quality of the education system has being been as an indicator of developed in that country. Due to its paramount importance of this issue, efforts for its adjustments or improvements have been amongst the top priorities of the countries. So the controversial question is which factor plays the most crucial role in this regard? A plethora of people is in the conviction that good salary can be an effective stimulus for lecturers to enhance their teaching. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that training the teachers in order to keep up-t-date both their knowledge and teaching methods can have better result. I am of the opinion that, both of the mentioned views have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate in this perspective.
First and foremost, the nature of the human has been established based on the motivation. Undoubtedly, each person has particular goal for every single step that is being taken; therefore, one the most effective ways to encourage people to pursue the determined targets is setting appropriate motivation for them. Money is accounted as the good tool for the overwhelming majority of people to conduct specific actions, and the teachers is not exceptional in this list. If the tutors do not earn sufficient income they do not think beyond their duties. In fact, they become reluctant to improve the quality of their jobs, so after a while we encounter with the juveniles who just waste their time in school without gaining ay added-value. Consequently, earn raises and high salary are the fundamental means for urging the teachers pat enough attention to the class their fellow students.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that teaching to the children is not an acceptable element for recognizing the education system as a high-quality organization. Indeed, there are some factors that have prominent impact on the level on the education system. Obviously, the knowledge of the teachers is the primary factor. Accurate and up-to-date information of the lecturers can distinguish the children from their counterparts. Furthermore, being aware of diverse approaches for teaching and selecting the most suitable one is another essential element that can incredibly increase the quality of the education system. Assume the role of a knowledgeable teacher who does have the ability to utilize a proper method in order to convey the material to the students.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, I am convinced that neither the good salary, nor the knowledge and awareness of the teachers are solely sufficient for creating a high-quality education system. Subsequently, authorities should gather a lot of elements to provide suitable atmosphere for equipping the current generation with necessary tolls to be prepared to enter into the real society.
- Has technology made the world a better place to live? 76
- The bar shows men and women study full time and part time in three decades Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main featured and make comparison where relevant 100
- Has technology made the world a better place to live 88
- TPO 32 90
- Universities should spend more money on facilities(such as computer lab and technology in general) rather than on hiring some famous professors 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...achers is not exceptional in this list. If the tutors do not earn sufficient incom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17124735729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86420738096 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526427061311 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1103923725 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.65 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136226946365 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395370706585 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462183963936 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857191721574 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429398876007 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.