A/D it is more important for government to spend money on improving internet access than on public transportation.
Some people believe that government should spend money on improving public transportation, while I believe improving internet access is more important. My reasons are based on my life observations.
First of all, government emphasizes the needs of people, and great internet access can fulfill various needs of people. To be more specific, we are able to find almost whatever information we want through the Internet. For example, students use the Internet to acquire more education. Young man surf on the Internet to gain entertainment. Even elderly people learn the knowledge of healthcare from the Internet to live healthier. That is, better internet access makes most people happy. On the contrary, public transportation only benefits people who don’t drive. Consequently, government should build internet access first to take care of people’s needs.
Secondly, government wants to spend money on project that would work efficiently and well, and improving internet access can achieve that goal. When deciding which project to conduct, budget and time are important factors which government will take into consideration. Improving internet access does not cost a lot of money since it requires only updating old facilities such as computers. Furthermore, updating those machines takes less than a month. Nevertheless, to renew the transportation systems, government have to hire hundreds of workers and spend years to complete the project. That is, government would spend relatively less money and time on improving internet access. Obviously, the project of internet access improvement meets the expectation of government.
Thirdly, authorities care about their reputation, and working on improve the Internet helps them to build good reputation. For instance, since nowadays every person use smart phone or computer to surf on the Internet, people would praise the government because they are benefited with better internet. On the contrary, as we can tell from many cities, no matter how much effort the government puts to improve the public traffic, people never stop complaining about the traffic, and do not recognize their government. In other words, government should put effort on improving the Internet since it increases the reputation.
In sum, I firmly believe that government should spend budget on making internet access better. After all, government cares the needs of people and its reputation, and it has the ability to achieve a desired result by improving the internet access.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, after all, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55844155844 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89746750263 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524675324675 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8762714202 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0434782609 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7391304348 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47826086957 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509735148517 0.236089414692 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145046643382 0.076458572812 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1056788935 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292818306971 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747912640337 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.