The advertisement role of people for eating junk foods
The people always think to unhealthy food habit sources. While many people believe that it does nothing to do with the advertisement, I definitely insist on its role in eating junk food by people but simultaneously assert that it is not the most significant factor for this catastrophic habit. Among countless factors which can seriously vindicate from my idea that there are other reasons besides advertisement, I mention to three of the most conspicuous of them.
First of all, although it is plausible that we do not admit, the advertisement has an effect on our desires for doing things. At the first moment that we consider an advertisement maybe have a glance on or even may ignore it. But when they are repeated over and over, we definitely think to this question that whether this product has an innate value or can change the people life dramatically. For instance, take KFC, to the account, the company hired Britney Spears for having fanciful dancing on the stage while thousands of people are singing her songs and she does not feel tired due to eating fried chicken. KFC was repeating that 20 times a day. This kind of advertisement certainly attract the people attending and illustrate them these junk foods are enough nutrient that guarantees your ability for tolerating any kind of hardiness, physically at least.
Second, the government also can have a pivotal role. The proliferation of fast food restaurants, no rules to control their numbers and preventing the low quality of those that have a representative in cities, let the promotion of these bad habits. Statistics indicated that twenty-four percent of money-makers junk food restaurants as many facets such as the utilized materials, their place, the level of hygiene and so forth, possesses lower standard. They must be obligated by the government not people to reach the standard level and be punished.
Last but not the least, is the people role. In this technology era, all people consider themselves as a robot. Therefore, they look at to those things which they eat as a fuel to help them not stop their work. They don’t attend to the quality of whatever they eat which is just to eliminate their starving. As if the time goes, they make this view in their children and this will remain as a bad habit among the people.
In conclusion, there are many important factors alongside the advertisement which can lead to a bad eating habit. Many of them are aforementioned, but definitely, the most important question has remained. How can we halt the transferring of this to the next generation?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-17 | Ben Edward | 91 | view |
| 2020-02-03 | KathlinaYW | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | Shiimaaa | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Dekuku | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Sina-ss | 73 | view |
- If you give friends a way to reduce living expenses :1. Find a roommate sharing2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy less Frequently3. Buy cheap foods and cook home (do not often eat outside)Which way you will recommend to your friend and wh 73
- Integrated writing TPO40 80
- Independent writing TPO26Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. Use specific reasons 73
- Integrated writing of TPO 26 75
- The advertisement role of people for eating junk foods 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94022988506 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84424027375 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2446860113 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353986134375 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921180639356 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934657772308 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176059799589 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883317887805 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.