It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone extreme changes and became more complex. Initially, peoples used to get themselves busy with simple recreational games like telling stories and jokes. Whereas, now the things have turned over; monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought us exciting amusements like mass media. The emergence of this device has evoked attributing concerns and challenges; the major one is a social and cultural invasion. Indeed, the matter of programs' consistency with each nation's cultural values. The following essay takes an elaborating look at whether foreign movies and TV programs are fascinating or the local ones.
There is no denying that producing and broadcasting TV programs in the original country can easily establish emotional and semantic communication with audiences. In fact, their programs are inspired by culture, history, tradition, policy and geographical elements of that specific nation. The production of a film based on an impressive historical character could be an ideal example here. People due to their prejudice and patriotism sense would warmly welcome it and treasure as a national masterpiece. Also, filming a/an significant occurrence, novel internal advancements, local tourism attraction sites, old famous stories are attractive for native people. Furthermore, advocators of this viewpoint address the penetration of foreign culture and weakening of their values as a big concern. As a crystal clear sample, in some parts of the world families consider sexual matter out of given framework as a taboo, so availability of sexual-based movies would have a destructive effect.
Admittedly, restricting oneself by some trivial constraints would lead to losing some other chances and benefits. Actually watching foreign TV programs not only provides changes in our attitude toward the world, but also provides us with new knowledge and information. In this regard, a group of sociologists conducted research to find the effect of western movies on eastern Asia and Persian Gulf countries at the RMIT University, Australia. The result shows that people in these countries astonishingly are obsessed with western culture through over-watching of their movies. Adding special effects, using mysterious an exciting story, shouting on appealing sites and inserting wonderful soundtrack are the features that make western films outstanding.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that it has not definite partition that determines people mostly prefer internal movies or external. By this assumption, although accepting the apparently intriguing things is dangerous, rejection of every facing issue before having supportive reasons seems irrational.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following the statement?Being creative rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution a problem. 90
- The extended family(grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Younger school student children (age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math science, history, and language. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...a national masterpiece. Also, filming a/an significant occurrence, novel internal ...
^^
Line 2, column 989, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...movies would have a destructive effect. Admittedly, restricting oneself by some ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, look, so, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72985781991 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02656640774 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665876777251 0.524837075471 127% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4261400772 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138770628445 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037372514519 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447630287516 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786395315122 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255428841775 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.01818996416 138% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 86.8835125448 197% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.