It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone extreme changes and became more complex. In this condition, we became powerful to break seas and oceans and put our feet on every point in the world. Therefore, we need to have exhaustive information about our environment and there are several ways to attain this goal. Some people are of the opinion that the best way to learn about other nations is newspapers; whereas, some others take opposite viewpoint and believe that these ways got paled and became less efficient with emerge of new technologies. I wholeheartedly believe that we live in the 21st century and we should be up-to-date. The following essay provides an elaborating view of this statement.
Believe it or not, the time of reading newspapers and magazines comes to end, by appearing intelligent electronic sets. Only those how are old or has bias attitude toward this issue try to keep its contact with paper-based information systems. The monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought us easy access and most reliable tools that allow us to be conscious about our surrounding ambient. Cell phones, tablets, lab tabs, and personal computers as well as TV and radio, up to some point, are such devices that have a game-changing effect on our life. Suppose cell phones for instance, through it we can access mass information and seeking whatever is in our mind. Acquiring appropriate details about the destination for long holidays could be an ideal example here; indeed, the only way to survey the situation is using internet-based sets. Custom, costume, tradition, language, population, climate conditions, currency, government type, religious, tourist attraction sites, and transportation are some information contributing to the desired country can be gained thanks to smartphones.
Admittedly, there is a big difference between internet-based and paper-based models; the first one can be controlled by the user whereas in the second case you are constrained by a specific and certain material and knowledge. In a particular case, in the fist model, gathering information about specific elements of a considered country there is no choice except finding a magazine allocated to that required country which I so arduous job. The risk of finding the answer to questions in the first state is considerably low, but in the second one actually, there is no guarantee. The other outstanding feature that makes electronic sets unique is their ability to illustrate graphical images and movies, or even pinpointing the geographical location of places on the map.
To sum it up, the aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to reach a conclusive conclusion that newspapers and magazines are not suitable ways of getting information, especially about other countries. They have strict restrictions and also some difficulties in accessing.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement people who move out of their native village or towns are more successful and happier than people who stay in their native villages or towns. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this how' or 'those hows'?
Suggestion: this how; those hows
...aring intelligent electronic sets. Only those how are old or has bias attitude toward thi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd also some difficulties in accessing.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2461.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30387931034 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06428155611 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8822970841 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.526315789 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179679064953 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469761185991 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481878325835 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976418084609 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251695936504 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.