It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, the swift monumental scientific and technological achievements have placed the government between two main decisions. Indeed, it is logical to whether allocate large proportion of budget to the economic infrastructure development or to environmental issues. The following essay takes an elaborating look at both sides of the argument to reach a rational conclusion.
There is no denying that both issues are significant and also are tied together and are not separated. Hence, in the studying of them, all of the elements like available financial and natural resources as well as public awareness should be considered. Although economic development will not be accessible unless we, not behavior friendly with our surrounding, there are countries that are become prospered with the destruction of their habitation. Admittedly, this cannot be announced as a great triumph for those countries, in the future they will have to pay much more money on the compensation of imposed losses. Therefore, nature gives us ailment, so it's upon us to how treat with it. If a long-term outlook is a principal target, so environmental preservation must be taken seriously. Suppose Iran as a developing country, the quality of gasoline, deforestation, drying, and contamination of lakes and wetlands, garbage recycling, using renewable energies and advanced irrigation systems are not important for government.
Generally, the developing countries in order to tackle faced problems are forced to over-use and abuse the natural reserves inevitably. The assigned strict regulations for preserving wildlife (fauna and flora) frequently have been broken by these nations. Thus, a group of researchers has conducted an investigation at the ANU University to find the environmental treatment status in the first-world countries and third-world countries. Ultimately, they announced that as a country has thrived economy the ecological and biological conditions are good. So that, the ratio of economic budget to the environmental budget is 1.15 and 0.65 for wealthy and poor countries, respectively.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned countries we can reach a conclusive conclusion that as the economically powerful countries are more sensitive to their environment. Conversely, the economically weak countries fuel their industry by not putting severity on the ecological rules.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
- Do you agree or disagree：the best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’salary. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People would be happier with fewer possessions 59
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends? a. joining a sports team, b. participate in community activities, c. traveling. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...arated. Hence, in the studying of them, all of the elements like available financial and n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tting severity on the ecological rules.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, hence, if, look, so, therefore, third, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.609375 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29811719621 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7043239362 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164611421794 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447677291263 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449222429741 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973193094427 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217386558237 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.