Are people today more willing to help strangers?
Throughout life, there are numerous decisive tasks that increase someone's satisfaction with their lives, and people have to choose their desire task based on their personality. One of these activities is helping strangers, the popularity of which has been called into question lately. Some people believe that in the past the members of the society were more sympathetic and caring, while others feel that the overall inclination toward helping others has increased. Personally, I feel that despite their hectic daily schedule people today are more willing to help others, in comparison to the past. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, social networking sites has caused people to become more aware of what is happening in their surroundings. Since people today spend a huge amount of their time on these sites and application, they are very affected by them. So, it has become easier to notify people where the standards of living of the people is low and also make them emotional so that they start doing something about the situation. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, while I was spending my vacation in a breathtaking beautiful village near my hometown, I encountered some kind villagers with heavy burdens on their backs. They did not have suitable clothes or shoes and they lived in damaged and old houses, where they even did not have basic amenities such as light or water piping. I talked to them about their situation and got their permission to post some photos of their living conditions on my instagram account in order to ask for help. In just a few days many kind volunteers gathered clothes and food for them and some of my friends even started a virtual campaign to help renovate their houses. Without social networking sites, their voices could not have been heard.
Moreover, people today enjoy higher levels of welfare than in the past, so they are more capable to help others. In recent years the average amount of income that people receive has increased. Hence, they can separate a portion of their income to help the people who are in need. In contrast, when people do not have a good income, they are not able to even consider others, since they have problems themselves. For example, my uncle has a profitable firm and he can easily devote parts of its income to the poors.
In conclusion, I believe that today people are more likely to help strangers than in the past. That is because social networking apps have made them more aware and because their level of welfare has increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-24 | fash | 90 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | JapaneseGirl48 | 70 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | fmichela | 60 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | Andromeda | 83 | view |
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 70
- TPO 58 Integrated SPARTACUS 80
- TPO 43 70
- TPO 44 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85234899329 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45722124138 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527964205817 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7795851242 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315828975459 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106175725195 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126742509344 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235092790139 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821732107583 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.