around the world, people are living longer than ever before. Which of the following do you think are the main causes of this phenomenon? You may choose more than one option. ..
Longevity, as we all know, for the majority of people, is a critical issue. Due to the paramount importance of people’s living, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of experts. In this regard, many believe that these days, human beings live longer than in the past. Similarly, I believe that both medical and psychological factors are responsible for this phenomenon. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that people have a long life is related to advancements in the medical field. Undoubtedly, the previous generation suffered from a lack of facilities or knowledge. In fact, many had been died because of diseases that are considered curable these days. The advancement of technology alongside the development in science, especially in medicine, all in all, provide human beings with a better health condition and prepare cure even for hard or so-called incurable diseases. Take my personal experience as an example. My grandfather told me a story about a pandemic malady when he was a child. Everybody had got sick, and there was no amenity to fix the problem. So, many suffered from the symptoms of the ill and died sooner than doctors’ expectations. Not only was the facility inadequate, but also the knowledge was in the same. In comparison with the past, nowadays, people live in better conditions. In many nations, the health check monthly-better methods assign for older people in particular- and also, the number of deadly diseases is reduced tremendously. So, longer life is the result of these functions.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the improvement in psychological aspects that help people live longer. Without a doubt, in the past, the meaning of life was limited. To illustrate, humans who are born with an instinct to survive, when they had fulfilled this aim and gave birth, never had another purpose and were waiting for their death. On the other hand, as a result of welfare, better hob circumstances, and advancements in technology, people start a new era right after their retirement. They start to do the activities they had loved. In other meaning, the better the lifestyle individuals have, the better the life span they experience. Scientifically speaking, there are a number of scientists that subscribe to the view that this longevity will become greater in the next century. They propose that if this hopeful lifestyle continued, through a persistent rate, the next generation would have a longer life. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that the upcoming rate cannot be guaranteed, an increasing number of shreds of evidence that prove this constant rate show otherwise.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that the better life span is the consequence of better knowledge, medical science, and lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 882, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... also the knowledge was in the same. In comparison with the past, nowadays, people live in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, similarly, so, in fact, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20125786164 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93414183013 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557651991614 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9979721626 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106619359048 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287019174877 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370224178023 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605316965817 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400598294334 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.