Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Children should only play sports for fun, not in competitions or contests.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Children should only play sports for fun, not in competitions or contests.
Children, as we all know, are critical members of human beings’ society. Due to the paramount importance of children both for families and governments, efforts for elevating their effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of psychologists. In this regard, many believe that children’s games should be just for fun rather than a match. Contrary to common belief, I believe that competitions bring advantageous effects on children. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that contests play a pivotal role is related to their lessons for teaching social laws. Undoubtedly, an inseparable part of kids’ life is playing. Scientifically speaking, one can learn how to behave from the very beginning ages through games. Moreover, Competition teaches a person how failure feels and how they should tackle with unpleasant occurrences. In other words, games are indirect teachers that the most important rules are taught by them. Besides, children learn many things from the competition they experience while they play. Lessons like what do bonds mean? Why should they be respectful toward laws? What is the meaning of success? What is true, or what is wrong? All in all, they are the base that helps children to understand the bigger and far more important social rules. The more engagement they have in competitions, the more lessons they learn. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that parents can play the same role to teach rules to children, an increasing number of shreds of evidence show that contests are much more influential means.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the game’s effects on children’s feelings. Without a doubt, children should learn how to afford their emotions. They should understand how to control adverse, unexpected, or positive feelings in their relationships in adulthood. For instance, if kids did play with their friends, the excitement they feel could be balanced. Children’s behavior becomes balance as well. Besides, when kids expose to an upcoming contest, they will have different feelings like anxiety, stress, and excitement. When they engage in such events, they understand how much concern is needed for a contest or whether it is necessary to become anxious? The interaction and emotions a kid feels make his feelings stable. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when I was young, I wanted to participate in a drawing match. At that time, it was a challenging issue for me because I had never taken part in any contest before. The number of different feelings I had that time, was confusing for me. I did not have any Idea about the match and the mood it can provide. After that competition, I understood how I should control the situation in order to feel stable. What would have happened if I never took part in that event? Needless to say, I would learn about my emotions with delay.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that game alongside with competition not only provide children with remarkable experiences about social rules but also can balance their feelings in the best way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...balance their feelings in the best way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80697183974 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530909090909 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.6003584229 180% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4060222687 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3513513514 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8648648649 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45945945946 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320379689956 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738785772933 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116124414315 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267267027658 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182938216675 0.0645574589148 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.