art industry; kids that have extraordinary athletic abilities can be sent to sport academy and receive professional training from coaches. From the above examples, it can prevent students from going in a wrong direction and provide them a platform to build their dreams.
In regard to whether governments should provide more fund on educating young kids that are under ten years old compared to universities. Some argue that providing more resources for kids at a young age can increase one's potential, others insist that universities need more funds to support better facilities and faculties. It is a controversial topic. Yet, my personal experiences and real-life observation have lead me to conclude with the former. My arguments are listed as follows.
To start with, young children are not yet fully molded and has the greatest chance to explore their interests and strengths. Never can we deny that the undergraduate students nowadays simply do not know what they want to pursue. For these students, going to class might be suffering since they have not set their own goal. But to utilize the money on enhancing the diversity of courses at a earlier stage, children can easily determine what they want to do and have the resources to train them on the path. For instance, kids that have talented art skill can be sent to art centers and explore deeper in the art industry; kids that have extraordinary athletic abilities can be sent to sport academy and receive professional training from coaches. From the above examples, it can prevent students from going in a wrong direction and provide them a platform to build their dreams.
In addition, governments should use the money to support families that suffer from financial issue and those who cannot afford to take fundamental education. Without the foundation of knowledge, one cannot contribute their skills to a firm. Consequently, the poverty will remain poor, and those with wealth will keep on striving in the future. To illustrate, when every individual have the opportunity to learn, then can everyone compete in the same society, and this also will provide a more competitive market enhancing the average standards.
Admittedly, everything has two sides and some may assert that universities need more money to upgrade the equipments and hire high-quality teachers. While this may be true, it does not apply to most of the cases. University's tuition fee across the whole nation is all gradually increasing, schools can earn up to millions every year. To compare the incomes of both high-level and lower-level educational institution, lower-level is more in need.
To conclude, taking into account these reasons, governments should put more focus on young kids, since they can develop earlier and build a stronger foundation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | leematt1214 | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 83
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 85
- art industry; kids that have extraordinary athletic abilities can be sent to sport academy and receive professional training from coaches. From the above examples, it can prevent students from going in a wrong direction and provide them a platform to buil 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...es for kids at a young age can increase ones potential, others insist that universit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n enhancing the diversity of courses at a earlier stage, children can easily dete...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, of course, in regard to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19512195122 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80433080558 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3551334637 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362741491967 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841565481621 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153891813311 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149944631286 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194377637325 0.0645574589148 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.