Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline
The reading passage explores the issue of Ethanol fuel and offers several critical arguments in support that it is not a good alternative resource. Although the statement in the article seems plausible in the beginning, the lecturer thinks that Ethanol fuel is actually a good replacement for conventional gasoline and casts doubt on the proposal for the following reasons.
First, according to the reading Ethanol fuel like gasoline releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere during the process, which offers no environmental improvement compared to the past. Nonetheless, this argument is challenged by the professor. She states that substantial amount of plants have to be planted in order to produce Ethanol fuel. Under this circumstance, the plants will greatly absorb the carbon dioxide released from Ethanol fuel. Therefore, result removing even more air pollution at the end.
Second, the writer contends that since a colossol amount of crops will be used for producing fuel, animals will face a lack of reliable food resouce. The reading material, however, rebuts this by asserting that Ethanol fuel is produced by the composition of the plant's cell wall. This particular part is not edible by animals, so the plants used for producing fuel will not interfere with the food supply for animals.
Finally, it is stated in the article that without the support of government on Ethanol fuel today, it simply cannot compete with the cheaper gasoline. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that when Ethanol fuel are more accepted by the society, more consumers will apply to this new resource and will eventually lead to a lower price. In fact, it is stated from a research study that when Ethanol fuel production increase three times, the price of it will be lowered by 40 percent. Thus, there will be no need for the government's funding in the future.
For all the above analysis, the professor disproves the three counterparts presented in the passage.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a good sense of humor 70
- A high school requires their students (aged 16-17) to choose an activity to attend in the summer holiday between 11th and 12th. Which of the following do you think is more beneficial?-taking part in the university-level course (for example, the course rel 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it’s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a good sense of humor? 80
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.-"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of th 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...l is produced by the composition of the plants cell wall. This particular part is not ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.171875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66238079252 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7843278602 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282783456118 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908801239454 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965002839922 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164642441009 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127331945283 0.0443174109184 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.