arts and athletics
Both artists and athletes are precious assets for a country, but when it comes to the question that whether governments should invest in either of arts or athletics, it brings up controversial doubts so that opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that it has more importance to spend money in the related fields of art while others believe that athletics should get more attention. Personally, I, to a huge extent, think that Olympic teams should receive more attention. Among countless reasons which can vindicate my point of view, I will explicate two conspicuous ones through the following essay.
The first reason that immediately comes into my mind is that they are representative of a country. For example, when teams attend some international competitions, a way they are dressed up and as a whole, a way they are looked like is important since they represent society to others. This example can shed more light on the issue. So the authorities should take into consideration to allocate a necessary budget to them.
The second reason that makes me hold this opinion is that the success of the Olympic teams of a country is a victory for that country. To be more specific, when teams in Olympic games achieve gold medals, indeed, they raise their country's flag among all other countries' flags attending the matches.
To wrap the argument, if we take a glance into advantages of spending money in support of the Olympic teams instead of the art fields, it will be soon recognized that it is more worthwhile, as the members of teams show the entire members of a country to others, and their success brings pride to a whole country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...at opinions vary from person to person. Many hold the opinion that it has more importance...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88732394366 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67697352703 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8201679448 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.181818182 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124755961208 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443852410675 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810521459217 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698563663566 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865900596433 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.