Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that travelling using tours has several advantages over travelling independently. Indeed, when we review trips memories shared by people in social networks, it would be good insight to prove this fact. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that in travelling independently, people have more freedom about their activities and do not need to harmonize themselves with others, so travel alone would be more enjoyable. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
First and foremost, travel by tours is cheaper than independent travelling. Most travel logs know some hotels with appropriate quality and modest price. Especially, because they reserve hotels for a large number of people, they have some discounts. In addition, transportation costs would be really lower in this way. For example, last year when I decided to travel to Turkish, when I compared travel cost by each of these two types. I had found out that my travel cost would be about half trough travelling by a tour than I want to travel alone.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that travel by tour would be safer than travel alone. It is very important specifically when people want to travel to an unknown region, or countries which do not have enough security. For example, I conducted a trip to the central desert of Iran. I had some experience of travel to deserts. Nonetheless, this region was completely different from my previous trips. There was not any village or sanctuary. Moreover, my GPS did not work accurately, and I missed the true way. It was a very dangerous experience for me, and I never want to repeat it.
Finally, yet importantly, travelling by a group of people would be a good opportunity to find new friends. Always, finding some confidence people with same travelling interest is a problem. Nevertheless, on the trips, you can know and make a relationship with people who have a lot of similarities with you. For example, I found my mountain climbing partners for an ascent to Damavand in one of this type of trips.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 76
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 58
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cially, because they reserve hotels for a large number of people, they have some discounts. In ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...a good opportunity to find new friends. Always, finding some confidence people with sa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, still, for example, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89218328841 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82304321959 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55525606469 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.402111065 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8636363636 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271851243637 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774665062371 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100361900935 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16378526412 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729277262977 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.