A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:
1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
2. Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using
online material that each teacher will study individually.
At present, many students and parents always complain that their teachers usually do not have excellent methods and ways to teach them. In this case, the department of education has to come up with some ways to solve this question, so some people propose that providing additional training to school teachers, they can study individually by using online materials. While other people suggest that leaders can organize a small group of teachers to take courses which are taught by the famous experts, and then teachers will go back to school and teach other teachers who do not learn the courses which are taught by famous.
From my perspective, I prefer to choose the latter one, because I think the latter one is more useful than the 1st one.
Firstly, teachers who study individually cannot learn any knowledge. This is because in the courses, if scholars meet some points which are not easy to understand, they cannot ask experts or their colleagues immediately. For example, our school organized a same activity like the title mentioned. However, because of the finical reasons, our school just could support 50% teachers to go to this activity, and other people just could use their smart phones or laptops to download material which were related to the activity. However, the materials are comprised of many complicated notions which were not easy to understand. Therefore, no one could understand the notions, and they could not connect with professors who taught in this activity. On the country, the teachers who went to the activity usually learned a lot of knowledge, because if they believed the conceptions were a little fuzzy and vague, they would ask professors. When they went back to schools, they would teach to other teachers the knowledge which they learned in the activity. From this event, we can find that studying some knowledge by individually is useless in some time.
Secondly, the teachers who are required to study individually might not study very well. This is because there is no one will monitor them, so they will not focus on the materials. I still use our school experience which is mentioned in the last paragraph to explain my second point. Even though, our school leaders required the teachers who stayed in the school to read the material every night after school. However, just few teachers elected to read the material. This is because other teachers preferred to do other things which had not relation with their work, such as, walking dogs, feeding babies, or shopping with friends. However, if they go to activity, I believe some tutors would compulsory them to study. It is obvious to see that teachers who study by themselves without other people’ help usually can study very well.
In conclusion, from this two points, I really think that if want to improve the quality of high school students’ classes. Sending teachers to take courses which are taught by some experts and then they go back to teach other teachers is the best way to to improve the quality of high school courses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-03 | 地狱博士后 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | evancheng | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | alicegreen13 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | MD. TOUKIR HASAN | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | keke | 85 | view |
- In order to make a business successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of thiree types of nutmnts, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisoins where relevant 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 60
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to t 73
- Students aged 13 18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers Do you agree with this view W 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... courses which are taught by famous. From my perspective, I prefer to choose ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 806, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'help'.
Suggestion: usually help
...y themselves without other people' help usually can study very well. In conclusio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...to teach other teachers is the best way to to improve the quality of high school cour...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99608610568 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53748367103 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454011741683 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3599581493 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2173913043 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.39130434783 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188702947893 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597819406883 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468336330015 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122569886876 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708999242765 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.