debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career
Nowadays, more and more people are debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career. Though there are many people who are special in one area are definitely successful, I agree with that it is more likely to success when you know different kinds of skills.
I hold this opinion for two reasons, and I will demonstrate my idea in the subsequent passage.
Firstly, solving a single problem always require different sorts of knowledge and skills. If you only fucus on one segment, it is unlikely to handle the real problem in life or work. My own experience is a compelling example to illustrate the importance of developing numerous skills. When I was in high school, my class was preparing to have a talent show in our school annual celebration and I was in charge of it. To begin with, I felt it is easy to finish because I only need to arrange some classmates to dance and sing. However, I realized it needs more soon, for a talent show also needs the accompanied music, setting, etc. Moreover, I have to learn how to edit music for the show and acquire basic setting knowledge for the show. This experience told me that I have to know different knowledge to have a single success.
Secondly, when you can apply a number of skills together, you can create something new. That is how creativity works, even though you will not feel it at the beginning. It just as what Steven Jobs said, you can't connect the dots looking forward, you can only connect them looking backward. For instance, my cousin was major in computer science in university. He gradually felt it is not his passion to focus on this area, therefore he took part in a finance graduate program, which is he really enjoy. After he graduated, he went to an investment bank, and there was so many paper works to do. So, he made a software to reduce the human's work and increase working productivity. Furthermore, He was prized and promoted by company because of the software. If he had not had both skills of finance and computer science, he would not have created the effective software.
In conclusion, I sincerely believe that developing a number of different skills is more possible to success. This is because dealing with a problem needs many kinds of skills, and because people can be more creative when they have more skills and information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | Junjie Yue | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | Junjie Yue | 70 | view |
- Many students are concerned how to make more friends since friends are significant to everyone In my opnion taking part in community activities is the best way to make more friends I feel this way for several reasons and I will demonstrate in the subseque 70
- creative 80
- debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career 70
- Do you agree or disagree the following sentence When people communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work of the project 70
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about the distinction reason for the sea cows The passage introduces three distinction theories while the lecture points out that all of the theories have problems First of all the reading demonstrates the sea 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... It just as what Steven Jobs said, you cant connect the dots looking forward, you c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, you know, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70802919708 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62204032365 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520681265207 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7122280435 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.9545454545 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277766435151 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795803129154 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169205251053 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186059533069 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169812091567 0.0645574589148 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.