Do u agree or disagree
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
it is argued that the usage of automobiles will be less than now in twenty years. In my opinion, I believe that cars will not be needed in the future, in particular in terms of developing technology and creating new type of vehicles.
On the one hand, developing technology is, maybe, one of the most important values in human life. technology is a development of something by using innovative informations to make efficient and effective. Thanks to the technology, people can improve the way of going somewhere decreasing the quantity of cars. For example, today there are a lot of cars in roads. Some of the roads are crowded because of every people wants to use their own car in order to reach to the targeted point. With a technological development, scientists may able to create a new efficient machine which is available for people and makes people to drop off using a car instead. As a result, in twenty years cars in use will be less than now because of technological improvements.
In addition to developing technology, creating new type of vehicles such as drones where people land on it is another noteworthy reason. instead of cars, new vehicles let people drive freely and safely. Owing to having this, one can use a machinery which covered safety packages and can fly. For instance, that kind of machine or vehicle can reach people to their requested area while flying on the air. there is no need for a car. developing such kind of vehicles could be available in twenty years. As a consequence, developed innovative vehicles take the place of cars and people are going to change their opinions possitively against to that kind of machines and use them.
In a nutshell, when all the specific reasons and relevant examples are considered and evaluated, it can be concluded that car usage in today will be decrease in the upcoming years with the help of developments in technology and new types of vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
it is argued that the usage of automobil...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the usage of automobiles...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...he most important values in human life. technology is a development of something by using ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...today there are a lot of cars in roads. Some of the roads are crowded because of every peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...and on it is another noteworthy reason. instead of cars, new vehicles let people drive ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...requested area while flying on the air. there is no need for a car. developing such k...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 433, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Developing
...on the air. there is no need for a car. developing such kind of vehicles could be availabl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84638554217 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79740479392 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496987951807 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5461294396 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6470588235 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216116415953 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782106947809 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081963991373 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163149481502 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600073087693 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.