It is tempting to think that working for businesses owned by one's family is a privilege since all profits go directly into the family's pocket. Nevertheless, from my perspective, it is better to work for businesses of someone else rather than devote one's energy to his or her family business.
On the one hand, the most significant problem of family-owned businesses is that it is hard to supervise. In most cases, family members not only share ownership of their company or store but also participate in the daily management of their business. Considering the emotional bond between these managers, who are all relatives to each other, it is difficult to get rid of personal feelings and make rational decisions for the company. My mother, for example, once invested in a factory along with my uncle. She worked delicately to win bids for the factory while my uncle was in charge of running the factory. With massive investment in money and time, my mother earned the factory considerable orders. However, their business was never profitable. It turns out that my uncle stole from the funding of the factory. If he were not a relative, my mother would have sued him for stealing. In the end, she merely withdrew her money without any punishment for my uncle's wrongdoing.
On the other hand, working in family businesses will limit one's choice of career. Unlike looking for a job in labor markets, where people could pick the companies that they are interested in, in which field will the family operate is often not up to a single person. Sadly, people may not like what their families are doing for a living. For instance, a friend of mine comes from a family that sells high-end watches for several generations. Unfortunately, the only hobby of my friend is music, and he would rather be a poor musician than to run his family business. Forcing him to work for the family is amount to destroy his dream.
Admittedly, the motivation for working for family business could be sufficient as people are eventually working for themselves. Nonetheless, tools such as stock option have similar functions, which encouraging people to work harder in businesses owned by someone else.
As a result, the benefits of working in companies owned by others bypass these of running a family business because family businesses are often harder to supervise, and people have little choice of their career if they decide to work for their family.
- Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.1) choose the members who think and work in similar ways. 2) choose the members who have totally different ideas. Which would you think is more effective to work with? 71
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want.Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 70
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one’s own family 83
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want.Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 70
- It’s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sses of someone else rather than devote ones energy to his or her family business. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...working in family businesses will limit ones choice of career. Unlike looking for a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92475728155 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67205892648 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8102438971 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.619047619 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.619047619 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47607181827 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150306178923 0.076458572812 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121476388027 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337178335852 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111383914021 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.