Do you agree or disagree
Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education become increasingly significant with the development of society. The approach of educating young children better is of importance and always interests plenty of people. From my perspective, I agree with that the best method to teach children is working in small groups.
Admittedly, studying alone could help children focus fully on work. If they work with others, especially for young children with their peers, they will be easily disturbed than working by themselves. If people around you are playing smartphone or chatting with a loud voice, it will be unconsciously to give up studying and join them. So, there is no doubt that children will concentrate more greatly on work when study alone than in groups.
However, there is no better way to communicate with each other than working in small groups. Communication is an indispensable aspect in children education. Young children are supposed to acquire knowledge through listening to other people’s opinion and sharing their own thinking. The knowledge children should obtain is not only from textbook, but from interpersonal relationships around them as well. For example, I took science class when I was a child. The teacher divided students into several groups and asked us to research science questions by working groups. It was the best experience since through this activity, except gained a bunch of scientific knowledge, I also practiced my communication skills. And to be honest, I still remember the scientific knowledge acquired from that class but I have already forgot about other classes. Therefore, more profound impression of knowledge is also the benefit of working in groups.
Furthermore, in many cases, working in small groups can offer the chance to expand children’s minds than studying alone. One person’s thinking is relatively single and insufficient. On the contrary, they have a grasp of point from others which they did not come up with by themselves initially. During the group discussion about math problem, take my own experience for instance, what I thought of was a quite complex method. If I didn’t work in group, the only way to solve this problem would take my lots of time. But luckily my classmates did have a better approach to deal with the puzzle and I leant a simple way to fix up this type of math problem. Compare with studying alone, working in groups will make it easier to find out more methods which really come into handy.
In conclusion, although there is advantage about working alone, it is unjustified to say that asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach them. Communication and opening up thinking are huge benefits of group working.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
...ired from that class but I have already forgot about other classes. Therefore, more pr...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng are huge benefits of group working.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, in many cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12925170068 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80584734903 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519274376417 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.668756513 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.48 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.64 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263920443757 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789271959478 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079835335684 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180591638753 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613916332026 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.