Do you agree or disagree with the following statement
People who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful
than people who just focus on one skill
Being successful is almost all people’s ultimate aim. The need of talent in current society requires people to be supposed to develop their abilities to finally achieve succeed. But whether acquire several fields of skills or just focus on one is the question that confusing us since the time and energy in life is limited. From my point of view, I agree with that trying to acquire more skills will help people on the way to success.
Admittedly, there is no better way to acquire professional knowledge and become the best in your area of expertise than paying attention fully on only one skill. Some special jobs, such as scientific research and space industry with high technology, are always looking for someone who devote his life to study one technique. There is no need for a researcher working on the manufacture of aircraft to learn skills of other fields. The only way to prove their success is through their achievements in space, not through their ability to draw a sketch or something else. If they diffuse their energy to study other skills, the time to improve professional skill will be insufficient and less likely to become successful.
However, this kind of special jobs are in the minority, after all. Mastering more than one skill in some cases can make people more likely to become successful since the people who embrace varieties of academic skills means diversified talents. From my own experience for example, I am a college student major in Japanese. Instead of using my whole time to study this language, I also focus on computer programming. I have already passed a national computer test and when I graduate from college, I can study program in Japan or find a job which needs employees not only speak Japanese but create computer program as well. There is no doubt that I will get more chance to achieve successful goal than my classmates who only learn language skill.
Furthermore, acquiring more skills does not limited to academic study, it also claims the skills in daily life, especially the skills to get alone with people. The growing number of working require people to interact with others. If a teacher only concentrate on knowledge from textbook and has no idea about how to teach student, how to let them interest in studying, he is not a successful teacher; if a merchant only focus on marketing produce and does not care about the opinion from consumers, he is not a successful merchant; if a politician only pay attention to publishing political tactics and does not listen to public voice, he is not a successful politician. Only practising professional knowledge is not enough, communication skill is also of importance.
In conclusion, although focus on developing one skill do have advantages of becoming successful, the best approach to be successful is acquiring more than one skill. Academic skills and the skills in dealing with people are both come into handy. Therefore, it is undoubted to say that acquiring more skills in several fields helps people more possibly become successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and less likely to become successful. However, this kind of special jobs are i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...eople who embrace varieties of academic skills means diversified talents. From my own ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'limit'
Suggestion: limit
...hermore, acquiring more skills does not limited to academic study, it also claims the s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.974609375 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71250109694 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49609375 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.9438590013 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.772727273 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460311729553 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137535535736 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128501091938 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280604092023 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11301911928 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.