Your supervisor and teacher requires you to choose the people who think differently
than you or do things differently than you as your group. Do you think it is more
effectively to finish a project than if you choose anyone you want?
Working in groups is the best approach to deal with tasks, especially at the age of emphasizing teamwork. Thus, what kind of people are more suitable for cooperating is worth thinking about. I agree with that choosing the people who think and do differently is more effectively to finish a project.
Different members in the group means full of different ideas and different methods to solve the problems. On the contrary, working with mind-like people is almost the same as working alone. One person ‘s mind is single and insufficient. Take my experience for example, I took a science course in college and we were asked to divided into groups. At the beginning, I found team members who were familiar with me. However, we were more likely to fall into the same puzzle because of similar thinking model. When I decided to invite someone who did things differently, although it was a little bit difficult to communicate, the speed of problem solving had increased since our different inspirations collide with each other and generate novel ideals. It helped us to finish the tasks perfectly and quickly.
Moreover, there is no doubt that people who think unlikely have a tendency to concentrate on different aspect about one problem, which can allow the group to consider more comprehensively and avoid missing significant points. If you cooperate with people who carry different opinions, when you research for a famous painting they will tell you about the art history; when you study of biology they will share the knowledge from bird to whale; when you prepare to do chemical project they will teach you how to conduct an experiment. In general, this kind of people provide multiple perspectives and gradually achieve the aim more effectively.
Furthermore, while completing the project, developing the communication skill is supposed to get attention. There is no better way to exchange views than working with people different from you. It is helpful to share opinions during the process it can not only finish the project, but practice the ability of making the balance between different ideas. Acquiring more skills through a project equates more effectively.
To put it in a nutshell, different ideas and comprehensive thinking are great advantages for teamwork. That is why I mentioned it is more effectively to finish a project with the people who think and do differently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...d things differently, although it was a little bit difficult to communicate, the speed of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in general, kind of, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10941475827 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81192013268 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562340966921 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.59665239 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.65 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383963688721 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093116942243 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103547244108 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209008031532 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814228080005 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.