do you agree or disagree? employees should work fast and risk doing mistakes rather than work slowly and make sure everything is correct?
Since the beginning of the current century, companies have forced their employees to work fast to increase their economic success. Some people believe that they should work fast and risk making mistakes; however, others cast doubles in this belief. From a personal perspective, workers should work slowly and make sure that everything is correct, given that it enhances safety, rational decisions and productivity.
The first and foremost point, making mistakes in some professional jobs is hazardous and could not be fixed. A vivid example that can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is pharmacists and physicians should make sure that everything is correct because patients' safety is the number one priority. Provided that they are relaxing on doing their work, they will ensure a strong health care system. Consequently, working slowly could promote safety.
Next coupled with safety, rational thinking is another benefit of slowly working. To put it in another way, relax working gives employees the chance to analyze relevant information, such as data, facts, opinions and judgments. A statistic done by The National Association of finance in California found that, although working fast could increase companies' revenues, employees could do risky mistakes. On the other hand, slow working employees do mistakes less often, given that they take the chance to make optimal decisions. Therefore, realistic thinking is significant to improve guidance based on facts.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. There is another subtle point that must be born in mind. workes who do their tasks quickly, are so stressed and start to hate their jobs. A survey conducted by Oxford University found that working under stress could diminish employees' productivity and increase the risk of some diseases, such as heart stroke and high blood pressure. However, stress-free employees can work effectively, and their minds could create new designs. As a result, relax working can boost productivity.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, working slowly has crucial benefits, and underestimating these benefits is not logical. It is suggested that companies design a new working system that helps employees to do their roles without stress and improves their work capacity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Christine hanna | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rational decisions and productivity. The first and foremost point, making mis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...working slowly could promote safety. Next coupled with safety, rational think...
^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nions and judgments. A statistic done by The National Association of finance in C...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to improve guidance based on facts. Although the previous reasons are the fi...
^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Workes
...subtle point that must be born in mind. workes who do their tasks quickly, are so stre...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relax working can boost productivity. Taking everything into consideration; wi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4247311828 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69642282186 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1570775754 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389196459777 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113676858369 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705967027074 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2343545462 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529236400043 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.