Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Socializing is an important aspect of human lives. Typically, we spend a lot of time with our group friends, whether big or small. Some people believe that having a smaller number of friends is better than making friends with a lot of people, especially in the long time. I, however, think that both of these could bring people joy and happiness. I will discuss my reasons below. Having a small group of friends can give you a chance to spend more time with them, get to know them deeply and understand them and their problems more easily and bond with them so deeply that they could become part of your family. People who can understand your humor, comprehend your problems and can stand by you in the hardships. Knowing that you have someone to turn to no matter what can give you a sense of protection and consequently, happiness. For example, I have two friends whom I befriended with 14 years ago. They have been there for me in hardships and happiness of my life and so was I, I hope. Even though I am living thousands of kilometers away from them, I have kept my close relationship with them and even speaking to them can make me happy.
On the other hand, having only a limited number of friends can limit some of your life experiences. The ability to make friends easily can also provide you joy and satisfaction. Having lived in a multi-cultural environment in the past few years taught me that the broader the number of your friends, the higher the possibility of being exposed to different cultures, different ideas, and different visions and expectations. This can also improve your wisdom, which consequently can bring you happiness.
To conclude, I believe that it is a wise idea to have a small group of longterm friends, but this should not be the limit for building a friendship with other people, as, they both equally can bring joy and happiness in one's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specifi Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... equally can bring joy and happiness in ones life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64071856287 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59805723471 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511976047904 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1822356653 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222284784586 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775344145653 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606083896011 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136808877158 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600267246194 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.