Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, making a friend was one of the communications and developing the connection. The majority of people believe it is very important to have a few friends but maintaining relationships for a long time. Hence, it beckons to the value of maintaining friendships. Though some hold an opposite view and states many new friends are far better than have a few for a long period. From my perspective, the former idea is more convincing and in the following paragraphs, I will cogently elaborate on my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that if you have a few friends, you are a cautious person and so not trust everyone. Besides, it seems the friendships have a great value and carefully care about it. To take an example to clarify more this issue is, my friend, Betty, hardly make friend, because she believes making different friend decrease the dignity of friendships, in other words, it shows the person find friend easily is indifferent according to his/ her friends.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that this ability helps you to develop your levels of tolerance and respect more to the individuals, indeed, who is your real friend. Thus, it provides some benefits to you that not only can you count on this relationship but also to have deeper friendship, in other words, it will fortify your communication without a shadow of a doubt. Owing to the fact that flexibility and being grateful have appeared in this behavior. As a case in point, I firmly feel blissful with which of my friends that I can trust her about all issues and share with him many private and personal matters that even my parents, in fact, do not know anything about them. The result of the study at Sharif University, one of the prestigious universities in my country, revealed that these people are more trustworthy in comparison to the persons who make friends as easy as drinking water.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although this ability may difficultly be obtained, it had considerable effects on our lives to be more happier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 21 integrated writing 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 70
- TPO 50 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l matters that even my parents, in fact, do not know anything about them. The res...
^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...considerable effects on our lives to be more happier.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, so, thus, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8602739726 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86123166668 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569863013699 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1576337112 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244303146797 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764530397118 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516612210475 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136517659067 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560259765492 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.