Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people disagree with the statement that students have to take a history course despite of the field they major. They believe that a university is a place for studenets to concentrate on learning essential skills in a professional field and to become an expert in the field. Therefore, taking unrelated courses wastes students' time. However, I don't think this way. In contrast, I advocate the statement that every student should take a history class, because a history class helps students learn better based on the failure of people in the past and become more creative.
Firstly, learning the failure from people in the past prevents students from doing the same mistakes and protects them from danger that people ran into before. For example, people used to live beside the railroad in my country. They did'nt aware that the air pollution and noise is harmful. However, after a few decades, they found that a high percentage of people who lived beside the railroad died in a very young age. This example was then recorded into our history textbook to educate students. So, are you still saying history courses are not required?
Moreover, learning from history makes studnets become creative. The former CEO of the biggest cellphone company,Jobs, used to say invention comes from copying the orginal idea and try to improve it. Nowadays, job markets are competitive, especially intellectual jobs. Therefore, in order to have more opportunity to find a better job, not only hardworking is important but also the sense of creation.
In sum, based on the reasons I proposed, I think there is no doubt for a college student to take a history class. Because history classes protect students from bad things that happened before, and also help students become creative.
- It s difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students learn Agree or disagree 50
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 70
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 68
- TPO Integrated 49 76
- TPO INTEGRATED 44 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ourses wastes students time. However, I dont think this way. In contrast, I advocate...
^^^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...se a history class helps students learn better based on the failure of people in the p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...beside the railroad in my country. They didnt aware that the air pollution and noise ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Jobs
...mer CEO of the biggest cellphone company,Jobs, used to say invention comes from copyi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for example, i think, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05119453925 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5736413623 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9967653444 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0588235294 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211287312158 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682216098795 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714908376321 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123263536708 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760728055943 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.