As a student majoring in Computer Science, I was required to take basic science courses like Physics and Biology in the first three years of my undergraduate study. I and almost all of my classmates were confused about why these syllabuses were made compulsory for us since we might probably not make use of them in our future career. If I had a choice, I would oppose all the college students being required to take basic science courses no matter what their majors are.
In the first place, taking basic science courses can put additional academic pressure on students. No matter what majors the students pursue, they are obliged to fully understand a series of professional courses. Besides that, for certain essential theories or indispensable skills, students are expected to master them, namely, being competent to not only comprehend them but also put them into practice. Furthermore, quantities of projects and examinations are employed as methods to examine whether they understand and become proficient in the professional knowledge or not, which give rise to the fact that quite a large proportion of students under intense stress. Taking these situations into consideration, there is no doubt that students will have to tolerate more academic pressure if basic science courses are added into their curriculums in that they have more intensive classes to attend, more deadlines to meet and more tests to review for. Take my experience as an example. In my sophomore year, several non-trivial but core courses like Algorithms and Data Structure were required to take. Learners could master them well by no means but programming a lot, like finishing the projects assigned by teachers, which were quite time-consuming and made me exhausted. What’s worse, a basic science course Physics was also demanded. Faced with another unfamiliar subject, I found myself under more stress because I wanted to get good performance in all these subjects. I endeavored to code for courses of my major and do the exercises for Physics at the expense of time and quality of my sleep. If I had a choice, I would not to choose to have the basic science class, since those core courses were challenging enough for me to study.
In addition, taking basic science courses might make it more difficult for students to equip themselves with other skills, such as communication, team cooperation, and leadership, well enough to meet the requirements demanded by corporations after graduation. Given that a student has to attend multiple additional classes and accomplish numerous projects, time and energy for him to enhance other skills must be limited. On the contrary, for those who only need to concentrate on their own field of study, they can make use of the spare time to participate in various activities to improve those skills. The contrast between my friend Linda, majoring in Accounting and me can illustrate this point. She was not required to take the basic courses while I was. As a result, she had more time to participate in students union and clubs. In the public speaking club, she practiced and got used to deliver speeches to the public, while I was still afraid of even speak in front of people. I really hope I could have more time to cultivate my presentation skills instead of all time used for studying so that I might be more confident in myself when I speak to others.
Admittedly, taking basic science has its own merits. The knowledge taught in basic science courses are the refinement of the wisdom of lots of masters, like Newton, Einstein. Learning this knowledge could make us understand the universe, the environment we live in and have a broader horizon. But all the knowledge could be learned by other ways, like through Massive Open Online Courses platforms like Coursera in place of forcing all students to learn it in the university. It is more advisable for students to choose whether to take them depending on their own interest.
In conclusion, I oppose that university student should take basic science courses if they do not major in that subject.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study. 90
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...concentrate on their own field of study, they can make use of the spare time to p...
^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rned by other ways, like through Massive Open Online Courses platforms like Cours...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, really, so, still, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the contrary, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3415.0 1977.66487455 173% => OK
No of words: 681.0 407.700716846 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01468428781 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10842213422 4.48103885553 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76061720858 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 212.727598566 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468428781204 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1083.6 618.680645161 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0023582573 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75862069 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4827586207 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13793103448 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279951744963 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869544072211 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779226967453 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212352140596 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727891288013 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.