Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place.
In a world where innovation and creativity rules, and with the proliferation of technology, these immense changes play a prominent role within the people’s life. Needless to say, there are valid arguments on the both side of this very topical debate. Some people dedicated their whole attention to technology and claims about the positive impact of these change. On the other side, some people may take issue with this argue, and see these changes as a fatal challenge. From my vantage point, life of a person, bombarding everyday by the side effects of science and technology. I will delve into my most monumental reasons through what follows.
First and the foremost, despite the conventional merits of science and technology in our lives, it had a negative impact on our environment through the disruptive efforts and activities. As we know, most of the lethal disease emerged through the scientific laboratories and it brought about dire consequences for human. For example, in Covid-19 crisis, all of the medical and health resources united to deal with this challenge, and unfortunately, after 2 years, there have been little improvement in vaccination. Besides, technology affects the nature harmfully and negatively, for example in the case of oceans and air, we see irreversible repercussions through the pollutions of advanced technologies including shipping, carrying and transportation structures and infrastructures.
As a second reason, in the modern era, all the human wants are prosperity. However, interruptive technologies put the lifestyle in a severe disaster, surrounded by confusing and annoying systems. Nowadays, due to the hustle and bustle of the modern hectic lifestyle, most of people earns money to disbursing on activities to throw away their stress. In my believe, it is the most vicious cycle of the contemporary technologic age. Take a personal experience, I have a sedentary vacation in a modern firm and although the company provided the most recent comfortable equipment, it obliged me to spend an inordinate amount of time on a boring and harmful activity. It is a foregone conclusion that to survive the current situation of our lives, we need to redesign our habits and rethinking about the use of technologies.
To make a long story short, it could be concluded that there are sweeping mistakes and severe problems on the improvement of science and technology. Furthermore, only with the governance of wisdom and logic is it achievable to reach the legitimated situation of science and technology. Because people inherently tend to pays painstaking attention to emerging technologies, the government should be responsible for the orientation of science to bridge the gap between technology and real needs of the world.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is not necessary for university students to attend classes as long as they can pass their examinations 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvement for the quality of people s lives have already taken place 76
- Tpo 53 3
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends 1 joining a sports team 2 participating in community activities 3 Traveling 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umental reasons through what follows. First and the foremost, despite the conv...
^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...human. For example, in Covid-19 crisis, all of the medical and health resources united to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... bustle of the modern hectic lifestyle, most of people earns money to disbursing on activities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ities to throw away their stress. In my believe, it is the most vicious cycle of the co...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inking about the use of technologies. To make a long story short, it could be ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 321, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'pay'.
Suggestion: pay
...logy. Because people inherently tend to pays painstaking attention to emerging techn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13015709288 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572082379863 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5983064687 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202030300695 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05263871294 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302935146418 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113408614126 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230896838211 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.