Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people argue that always telling the truth can jeopardize your relationships as it has its own drawbacks. People find it easy to disguise their flaws by not telling the truth. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that always telling truth is the backbone of any relationship. I will support my viewpoint with three reasons.
First of all, truth keeps any relationship binded forever. It acts to be the basic building block of any relationship. Concealing the truth can only jeopardize the connection between the two people. When a person completely trust it’s partner it shows how much they believe in the roots of their relationship. For example, a friend of mine was recently invited at a party there he met and bonded with new people. Few months later on my birthday when I had hosted a party, I invited him. However, he made some excuse. Suddenly few days later I met a common friend of ours who made me aware of the fact that on my birthday my friend was out their roaming and partying with his new friends. How much ever heart wrenching this incident was it left me flabbergasted and made me realize my importance in his life. lying to me sacrificing and our seven year friendship for his new friends whom he met just months ago had taken me aback. Hence, it shows how much important it is to have trustworthy people around you to have a peaceful and calm life.
Secondly, every parent child relationship should be honest. There should be proper communication between one another. If the child lies it breaks the confidence or trust that parents hold towards their child. For example, A friend of mine had lied to her parents for going on a trip with her college friends as she thought her parents would not give her permission to go. When they later got to know the truth they very furious. Such incidents often inculcate feeling of dishonesty towards the child. Henceforth, its difficult for them to trust their child easily. It’s certainly clear to see why one should not lie as the consequences aren’t good and can ruin your relationship with anyone.
Though some people would agree that lying sometimes may seem like an easy solution however it’s not the best of behavior. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that telling truth is better than hiding several lies, how much ever hard it is to be honest but it’s far better than to risk our long-term relationship.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-31 John7A7 76 view
2022-10-14 sponka 70 view
2022-10-14 sponka 73 view
2022-10-08 GRACE_047 60 view
2022-09-03 tanvik 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user tanvik :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the connection between the two people. When a person completely trust it’s partner ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
... people. When a person completely trust it’s partner it shows how much they believe ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 808, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lying
...e me realize my importance in his life. lying to me sacrificing and our seven year fr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...hild. For example, A friend of mine had lied to her parents for going on a trip with...
^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts would not give her permission to go. When they later got to know the truth they v...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77751196172 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60915741832 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528708133971 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0889012072 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.88 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.72 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174599051307 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522972134816 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624013674166 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121320327161 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914158628961 0.0645574589148 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the connection between the two people. When a person completely trust it’s partner ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
... people. When a person completely trust it’s partner it shows how much they believe ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 808, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lying
...e me realize my importance in his life. lying to me sacrificing and our seven year fr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...hild. For example, A friend of mine had lied to her parents for going on a trip with...
^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts would not give her permission to go. When they later got to know the truth they v...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77751196172 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60915741832 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528708133971 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0889012072 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.88 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.72 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174599051307 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522972134816 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624013674166 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121320327161 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914158628961 0.0645574589148 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.